tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8243665813146017811.post3150338735220389621..comments2023-05-15T08:42:43.055-04:00Comments on Vive Christus Rex!: One Vice-President Child Who Won't Be ScandalizedA Voice in the Crowdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14910627594877389819noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8243665813146017811.post-17235175038464782172008-09-04T17:27:00.000-04:002008-09-04T17:27:00.000-04:00My reply to this didn't go through either? Errrmm...My reply to this didn't go through either? Errrmmm... I'm beginning to wonder what the problem is now.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, I thought you'd be interested (maybe) in what my theology Prof. said in class today.<BR/><BR/>"It is important that you do not let your emotions get in the way of listening to what he has to say. There is no doubt in my mind that he is sincere in what he is writing and that he is not trying to be vindictive, malicious, or make anyone mad. He is not evil for his thoughts. We cannot ever presume to know someone’s motives. So don’t let your love or passion for your faith lead you to be angry with the author if he says something that you disagree with. You can’t think clearly that way. Sometimes we get angry or even the opposite, we get excited, and the emotional response to what someone says clouds our judgement. We have to act with Christian charity at all times. Assuming someone is evil or has malicious intent because they disagree with us or don’t understand something is not charitable."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8243665813146017811.post-3250491643329917032008-09-03T19:09:00.000-04:002008-09-03T19:09:00.000-04:00I guess my questions to you would be two-fold, Aly...I guess my questions to you would be two-fold, Alycin.<BR/><BR/>First, do you think their is any distinction between a 17-year-old girl who is not involved in politics in any way being "off limits" in regard to her pregnancy - or even Obama's young daughters with their lives- and a son of a candidate who is a political lobbyist with some questionable deals that involves Obama being "off limits"?<BR/><BR/>I think the first group is off limits, the second group because they are in the political realm is not.<BR/><BR/>The media thinks the first group is fair game, where the second group isn't.<BR/><BR/>You seem to think both are "off-limits", and that's your opinion. You are entitled to it.<BR/><BR/>Secondly, please remember Obama was the sole vote in the Illinois legislator against giving a baby born outside the womb that made it through an abortion any life-saving help what-so-ever, and sentencing he/she to die in a soil utility room. He did this for political expedient reasons.<BR/><BR/>This is an extreme view that results in a death of a human being. If he did this for a politically expedient benefit, is it a crazy thought to think any statement he makes might be suspect and done for the benefit of a political benefit?<BR/><BR/>I maybe wrong, but I maybe right.<BR/>It is my opinion, and I am entitle to it as well.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the post.A Voice in the Crowdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14910627594877389819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8243665813146017811.post-33227893301910550862008-09-03T10:11:00.000-04:002008-09-03T10:11:00.000-04:00You're stooping to their level.Obama was right whe...You're stooping to their level.<BR/><BR/>Obama was right when he said families of politicians should not be dragged through the mud and that anyone found making comments on Palin's daughter would be fired. I am surprised at reading this here. Not at the content, but at the fact that you'd go there.<BR/><BR/>You have no idea what the "true motives" are behind Obama's statement. You have absolutely no idea if he was sincere, but I am betting he was. The fact that people are bringing up Palin's daughter is wrong. And so is this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com